Judgment_paragraph 78 · Anastasia Panayotopoulou v European Parliament (T-16/90)

78Moreover, the Parliament relies on the judgment of the Court of Justice in Case 143/82 Lipman v Commission [1983] ECR 1301, at p. 1311 in observing that competitions are independent of one another, being organized according to different procedures and pursuing different aims, which means that a candidate cannot rely upon the conditions for admission to another competition, even one organized by the same institution. It further contends that the sole objective of Article 1(1) of Annex III to the Staff Regulations is to specify the items that must be contained in each notice of competition and that its provisions are thus not to be regarded as regulating the content of those items. Finally, the Parliament contends that the applicant's argument that the studies which she pursued in the institute in question were of university standard is not of such a kind as to remove its doubts in that respect.

Anastasia Panayotopoulou v European Parliament (T-16/90)

History · 1 version

Key facts

Connections