Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

European Union
Extramet Industrie SA v Council of the European Communities (C-358/89)
Judgment
14

Extramet Industrie SA v Council of the European Communities (C-358/89)

law://eu/cjeu/1989/c-358-89/para_14@2026-11-13

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Full Court
Case: C-358/89 · ECLI:EU:C:1991:214
Decided: 16 May 1991
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Extramet Industrie SA
Defendant: Council of the European Communities
Rapporteur: Schockweiler
Advocate General: F. G. Jacobs
Bench: 12 judges
O. Due, G. F. Mancini, T. F. O'Higgins, J. C. Moitinho de Almeida, G. C. Rodriguez Iglesias, M. Diez de Velasco (Presidents of Chambers), C. N. Kakouris, R. Joliét, F. A. Schockweiler, F. Grévisse, M. Zuleeg, P. J. G. Kapteyn
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 61989CJ0358

Topics

History · 1 version

16 May 1991Reading

Judgment of 16 May 1991

14It follows that measures imposing antidumping duties may, without losing their character as regulations, be of individual concern in certain circumstances to certain traders who therefore have standing to bring an action for their annulment.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Connections

Cited by 23: Lorenz Kiene and Others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-487/24); European Association of Non-Integrated Metal Importers & distributors (Euranimi) v European Commission (C-252/23); Zippo Manufacturing Co. and Others v European Commission (T-402/20); Ascenza Agro, SA and Industrias Afrasa, SA v European Commission (T-77/20); Uzina Metalurgica Moldoveneasca OAO v European Commission (T-245/19); Roland SE v European Commission (T-132/18); Changmao Biochemical Engineering Co. Ltd v European Commission (T-541/18); Trace Sport v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane, kantoor Eindhoven (C-251/18); Rotho Blaas Srl v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli (C-207/17); Distillerie Bonollo SpA and Others v Council of the European Union (T-431/12)2 provisions; Canadian Solar Emea GmbH and Others v Council of the European Union (T-162/14); Yingli Energy (China) Co. Ltd and Others v Council of the European Union (T-160/14); JingAo Solar Co. Ltd and Others v Council of the European Union (T-157/14); Crown Equipment (Suzhou) Co. Ltd and Crown Gabelstapler GmbH & Co. KG v Council of the European Union (T-351/13); Molinos Río de la Plata SA and Others v Council of the European Union (T-112/14); Marquis Energy LLC v Council of the European Union (T-277/13); Growth Energy and Renewable Fuels Association v Council of the European Union (T-276/13)2 provisions; Portmeirion Group UK Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs (C-232/14); C & J Clark International Ltd v The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs and Puma SE v Hauptzollamt Nürnberg (C-659/13, C-34/14); TMK Europe GmbH v Hauptzollamt Frankfurt (Oder) (C-143/14); Crown Equipment (Suzhou) Co. Ltd and Crown Gabelstapler GmbH & Co. KG v Council of the European Union (T-643/11); ‘Valimar’ OOD v Nachalnik na Mitnitsa Varna (C-374/12); Gold East Paper (Jiangsu) Co. Ltd and Gold Huasheng Paper (Suzhou Industrial Park) Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union (T-444/11)
Cites 12: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Allied Corporation and others v Council of the European Communities (53/83); Enital SpA v Commission and Council of the European Communities (C-304/86); Electroimpex and others v Council of the European Communities (C-157/87); Council Regulation (EEC) No 2808/89 of 18 September 1989 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of calcium metal originating in the people's Republic of China and the Soviet Union and definitively collecting the provisional anti-dumping duty imposed on such imports; Commission Regulation (EEC) No 707/89 of 17 March 1989 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of calcium metal orginating in the People's Republic of China or the Soviet Union; Extramet Industrie SA v Council of the European Communities (C-358/89); Plaumann & Co. v Commission of the European Economic Community (25/62); Allied Corporation and others v Commission of the European Communities (239/82, 275/82); Gestetner Holdings plc v Council and Commission of the European Communities (C-156/87); Neotype Techmashexport GmbH v Commission and Council of the European Communities (C-305/86, C-160/87); Nashua Corporation and others v Commission and Council of the European Communities (C-133/87, C-150/87)