275/85 · GlobalLawDB

Contents

Judgment of the Court27 January 1987^noteIn Case 275/85Commission of the European Communities, represented by Sergio Fabro, a member of its Legal Department, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the office of G. Kremlis, also a member of its Legal Department, Jean Monnet Building, Kirchberg,vItalian Republic, represented by L. Ferrari Bravo, Head of the Contentious Affairs Department, acting as Agent, assisted by I. M. Braguglia, avvocato dello Stato, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the Italian Embassy, 5 rue Marie-Adélaïde,THE COURTcomposed of: Lord Mackenzie Stuart, President, C. Kakouris and T. F. O'Higgins (Presidents of Chambers), G. Bosco, T. Koopmans, K. Bahlmann and G. C. Rodriguez Iglesias, Judges,Advocate General: M. DarmonRegistrar: J. A. Pompe, Deputy Registrarhaving regard to the Report for the Hearing, as supplemented further to the hearing on 16 September 1986,after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General delivered at the sitting on 18 November 1986,gives the following

Judgment

1By an application lodged at the Court Registry on 6 September 1985 the Commission of the European Communities brought an action under Article 169 of the EEC Treaty seeking a declaration that by authorizing, in respect of final importation, the release in stages of goods which are declared on a single entry form for release for free circulation, the Italian Government has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Treaty and Article 19 of Commission Directive 82/57/EEC of 17 December 1981 laying down certain provisions for implementing Council Directive 79/695/EEC on the harmonization of procedures for the release of goods for free circulation (Official Journal 1982, L 28, p. 38).

2Reference should be made to the Report for the Hearing for the relevant provisions of Italian law and the submissions and arguments of the parties, which are mentioned or discussed hereinafter only in so far as is necessary for the reasoning of the Court.

3It is common ground that, in respect of the final importation of goods, the second paragraph of Article 80 of the Testo Unico delle Disposizioni Legislative in Materia Dogonale [Consolidated Text of Customs Legislation] {Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana No 80 of 28 March 1973, p. 3 of the Supplemento Ordinano) allows the option of releasing goods in stages, whereas the first paragraph of Article 19 of the aforesaid Directive 82/57 provides: ‘Release of... goods for free circulation shall be given on a single occasion for all the goods forming the subject of the entry’.

4According to the Italian Government the release of goods in stages is provided for by Article 4 of Council Directive 78/453/EEC of 22 May 1978 on the harmonization of provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action concerning deferred payment of import duties or export duties (Official Journal 1978, L 146, p. 19). The first subparagraph of Article 4 (1) provides as follows:‘The amounts due as import duties or export duties for goods for which removal has been authorized during a given period, which may not exceed 31 days, may be dealt with by one single entry in the accounts at the end of the period by the competent authorities.’

5The Italian Government takes the view that the literal and logical meaning of Article 4 (1) is that it is both possible and lawful to release in stages goods which may be covered by a single entry in the accounts.

6The Italian Government notes that there is no provision in Council Directive 79/695/EEC to suggest an intention to abolish the option of release in stages. It cannot therefore be supposed that Article 19 of Commission Directive 82/57 ‘laying down certain provisions for implementing Council Directive 79/695/EEC... ’ can have the effect of abolishing a right conferred by Article 4 of Council Directive 78/453.

7It should be observed in this connection that the wording of Article 4 shows that its purpose is not to regulate or harmonize the rules for the release of goods. That article is concerned with the possibility of dealing, by a single entry in the accounts, with amounts due by way of duties incurred on the importation or exportation of goods whose removal has been authorized during a given period and the conditions under which this may be done.

8An interpretation of Article 4 by reference to its context points to the same conclusion. That article forms part of the Council directive on the harmonization of provisions regarding deferred payments, the purpose of which is quite different from that of the Commission directive at issue in the present case.

9As long as there was no harmonization of national provisions governing the rules for the release of goods, Article 4 could be applied either in the case of a release in stages of goods declared on a single entry form for release for free circulation or in the case of successive releases of goods declared on a number of entry forms. The article in no way predetermined the detailed rules regarding release.

10Those rules, however, constitute part of the procedures for the release of goods for free circulation and those procedures are harmonized by Council Directive 79/695 and by Commission Directive 82/57 which implements it. Since Article 19 of the Commission directive provides that release of goods for free circulation is to be given on a single occasion for all the goods contained in the entry, the application of Article 4 of Council Directive 78/453 on deferred payment can still apply only to the entry in the accounts of duties incurred by goods which are declared on a number of entry forms and are the subject of successive releases during a given period.

11It follows that the Italian Government may not rely on Article 4 of Council Directive 78/453 to justify the noncompliance of its legislation with Article 19 of Commission Directive 82/57.

12It must therefore be held that by authorizing, in respect of final importation, the release in stages of goods which are declared on a single entry form for release for free circulation, the Italian Government has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EEC Treaty and Article 19 of Commission Directive 82/57/EEC of 17 December 1981 laying down certain provisions for implementing Council Directive 79/695/EEC on the harmonization of procedures for the release of goods for free circulation.

Costs

13Under Article 69 (2) of the Rules of Procedure the unsuccessful party is to be ordered to pay the costs; since the defendant has failed in its submissions it should be ordered to pay the costs.

Operative part

On those grounds,THE COURThereby:

(1).Declares that by authorizing, in respect of final importation, the release in stages of goods which are declared on a single entry form for release for free circulation, the Italian Government has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EEC Treaty and Article 19 of Commission Directive 82/57/EEC of 17 December 1981 laying down certain provisions for implementing Council Directive 79/695/EEC on the harmonization of procedures for the release of goods for free circulation;

(2).Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

Delivered in open court in Luxembourg on 27 January 1987.