34It must be observed in that connection that the difference between the two sums which were compared in Cases 4/79 (concerning Regulations Nos 1910/76, 2466/76 and 938/77) and 109/79 (concerning Regulation No 938/77), in which the Court delivered judgment on 15 November 1980, was about 30%. In Case 145/79 (concerning Regulation No 652/76) the difference was about 12% but was distorted by the method of fixing the monetary compensatory amount for starch, which had been calculated on the basis of the intervention price for maize without deducting the production refund on starch. If, on the other hand, the calculation is based on the intervention price for maize reduced by the aforementioned production refund, as was laid down in the Court's judgment in that case, the monetary compensatory amount fixed for starch would necessarily be higher, and that would also increase the abovementioned difference.
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.