Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
G.R. Amylum v Council of the European Communities (108/81)
JUDGMENT
Facts and Issues
I —Facts and written procedure
A —Background to the dispute
11.

G.R. Amylum v Council of the European Communities (108/81)

Judgment of 30 Sept 1982law://eu/cjeu/1981/c-108-81/para_11@2026-11-11

11.Case 179/80 is, however, still pending before the Court.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: 108/81 · ECLI:EU:C:1982:322
Decided: 30 Sept 1982
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: G. R. Amylum, a company incorporated under Belgian law, having its registered office at 479 Avenue Louise, Box 57, 1050 Brussels, represented by Michel Waelbroeck, advocate, a member of Liedekerke, Wolters, Waelbroeck & Kirkpatrick, 341 Avenue Louise, 1051 Brussels, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the Chambers of Ernest Arendt, advocate, 34 Rue Philippe-II
Defendant: Council of the European Communities, represented by Daniel Vignes, Director of its Legal Department, assisted by Arthur Bräutigam, Administrator in that department, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the office of H. J. Pabbruwe, Director of Legal Affairs at the European Investment Bank, 100 Boulevard Konrad-Adenauer
Rapporteur: Grévisse
Advocate General: G. Reischl
Bench: 2 judges
A. Chloros, F. Grévisse
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 61981CJ0108

Topics

Acts of the institutions Common organisation of the markets Own resources

History · 1 version

30 Sept 1982Reading

Connections

Cited by 23: Eurobolt BV and Others v European Commission (T-479/20); Human Operator Zrt. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága (C-434/17); KV v European Commission (T-104/15); European Dynamics Luxembourg SA and Evropaïki Dynamiki - Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Commission (T-752/15); SV Capital OÜ v European Banking Authority (EBA) (C-577/15 P); Éditions Odile Jacob SAS v European Commission (C-514/14); Viasat Broadcasting UK Ltd v European Commission (T-125/12); Italian Republic v European Commission (T-527/13); Éditions Odile Jacob SAS v European Commission (T-471/11); European Commission v Portuguese Republic (C-335/12); Guangdong Kito Ceramics Co. Ltd and Others v Council of the European Union (T-633/11); Télévision française 1 (TF1) and Others v European Commission (T-520/09); Andreas Kalmár v European Police Office (Europol) (F-83/09); Evropaïki Dynamiki - Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v Agence européenne pour la sécurité maritime (EMSA) (T-70/05); Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities (T-259/05); People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran v Council of the European Union (T-256/07); Public procurement - Community tender procedure - Obvious clerical error - Award to the tender offering best value for money - Abnormally low tender - Article 139(1) of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 - Plea of illegality - Specifications - Admissibility (T-495/04); Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-417/06); Aluminium Silicon Mill Products GmbH v Council of the European Union (T-107/04)2 provisions; Neophytos Neophytou v European Commission (F-22/05); Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities (T-226/04); Michael Cwik v European Commission (T-96/04); Yassin Abdullah Kadi v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities (T-315/01)2 provisions
Cites 13: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)7 provisions; Maizena GmbH v Council of the European Communities (139/79); Council Regulation (EEC) No 1111/77 of 17 May 1977 laying down common provisions for isoglucose; Council Regulation (EEC) No 1592/80 of 24 June 1980 on the application of the system of production quotas in the sugar and isoglucose sectors during the period 1 July 1980 to 30 June 1981; Council Regulation (EEC) No 387/81 of 10 February 1981 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1111/77 laying down common provisions for isoglucose; Council Regulation (EEC) No 1293/79 of 25 June 1979 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1111/77 laying down common provisions for isoglucose; SA Roquette Frères v Council of the European Communities (179/80); A. Racke v Hauptzollamt Mainz (98/78); SA Roquette Frères v Council of the European Communities (138/79); 70/243/ECSC, EEC, Euratom: Council Decision of 21 April 1970 on the replacement of financial contributions from Member States by the Communities' own resources; Regulation No 1009/67/EEC of the Council of 18 December 1967 on the common organisation of the market in sugar; Regulation (EEC) No 3330/74 of the Council of 19 December 1974 on the common organization of the market in sugar; Weingut Gustav Decker KG v Hauptzollamt Landau (99/78)